Comparing John Locke, John Stuart Mill, and Jean-Jacques Rousseau Essay

Comparing John Locke, John Stuart Mill, and Jean-Jacques RousseauJohn Locke, John Stuart Mill, and Jean-Jacques Rousseau all dealt with the disoblige of governmental liberty at bottom a confederacy. John Lockes The Second Treatise of presidency, Mills On Liberty, and Rousseaus Discourse On The Origins of Inequality ar influential and compelling literary works which while outlining the conceptual mannikin of each thinkers ideal recite present diverging visions of the very nature of man and his freedom. The three have somewhat distinguishable views regarding how much freedom man ought to have in political society because they have different views regarding mans basic potential for inherently good or evil behavior, as well as the ends or purpose of political societies. In order to examine how each thinker views man and the freedom he should have in a political society, it is necessary to secure freedom or liberty from each philosophers perspective. John Locke states his doct rine that all men exist in a state of arrant(a) freedom to order their actions and dispose of their possessions and person as they think fit, within the bounds of the law of nature, without asking leave or depending upon the will of both other man. (Ebenstein 373) Locke believes that man exists in a state of nature and so exists in a state of uncontrollable liberty, which has only the law of nature, or reason, to restrict it. (Ebenstein 374) However, Locke does state that man does not have the license to supplant himself or any other creature in his possession unless a legitimate purpose requires it. Locke emphasizes the ability and opportunity to own and profit from post as necessary for being free. John Stuart Mill defines liberty in relation to three sph... ...Mill does not implicitly trust or distrustfulness man and therefore does not explicitly limit freedom, in item he does define freedom in very liberal terms, unless he does leave the potential for unlimited interve ntion into the personal freedoms of the several(prenominal) by the state. This nullifies any freedoms or rights individuals are said to have because they guinea pig to the whims and fancy of the state. All three beliefs regarding the nature of man and the purpose of the state are bound to their respective views regarding freedom, because one position perpetuates and demands a induction regarding another. BibliographyWorks CitedCress, Donald A. Jean-Jacques Rousseau The Basic political Writings. IndianapolisHackett, 1987.Ebenstein, William. Great Political Thinkers From Plato to Present. New York Rinehart & Co, 1951.