The Life Of Friedrich Daniel Ernst Schleiermacher Religion Essays

The Life Of Friedrich Daniel Ernst Schleiermacher Religion Essays The Life Of Friedrich Daniel Ernst Schleiermacher Religion Essay The Life Of Friedrich Daniel Ernst Schleiermacher Religion Essay The boy of a Reformed chaplain, Friedrich Daniel Ernst Schleiermacher received his instruction at establishments of the pietistic Moravian Brethren in the towns of Niesky and Barby. In 1787, his male parent granted him permission to go on his surveies at the University of Halle, where he devoted himself non merely to theology, but besides to Greek doctrine and to his coevalss, Carl Gustav Jacob Jacobi and Immanuel Kant. After his graduation in 1790, Friedrich Daniel Ernst Schleiermacher served as a coach to a baronial household in East Prussia for three old ages, where he besides served as a sermonizer. During this clip he worked on three essays in moralss, all of which remained unpublished: ber hyraxs hchste Gut ( On the highest good, 1789 ) , with this summum bonum being the overall intent of adult male and the existence ; ber den Wert des Lebens ( On What Gives Value to Life, 1792/3 ) , a defence of ethical diverseness ; and ber die Freiheit ( On Freedom, 1790-3 ) , a contemplation on the relation between freedom and morality. In 1794, Friedrich Daniel Ernst Schleiermacher completed his 2nd scrutinies. After a stay in Landsberg he became a curate at the i?Chariti? , i? a infirmary in Berlin. There he met several members of the Romantic motion, among them the Schlegel brothers. Lending several essays to their diary Athenaeum, Friedrich Daniel Ernst Schleiermacher besides shared a level with Caspar David Friedrich. During this clip, he expounded upon Plato, Immanuel Kant, Johann Gottlieb Fichte, and Baruch Spinoza. On the latter he wrote two outstanding essays, Spinozismus and Kurze Darstellung des Spinozistischen Systems ( Brief Presentation of the Spinozistic System ) . Possibly his most influential book on the doctrine of faith was Reden i?ber dice Religion ( On Religion: Addresss to its Cultured Despisers, 1799 ) , which gained him noteworthy prominence. Concentrating on the perennial nature of faith, he attempts to contrast the common impression of a decay of faith: i? I do non chime in with the call for aid of most of them refering the death of faith, for I would non cognize what other age may hold accommodated it better than the present.i? By this he besides sought to accommodate the Romantics with faith, emphasizing that the latter is a i?feeling of the universei? and i?a sense and gustatory sensation for the Infinite.i? Belief, Friedrich Daniel Ernst Schleiermacher provinces, i?must be something different from a mixture of sentiments about God and the universe, and of principles for one life or for two. Piety can non be an replete craving for a muss of metaphysical and ethical crumbs.i? He strongly advocates for a separation between Church an d State and, though at the same clip deploying a stiff hierarchy of the different faiths, for spiritual tolerance. The book consists of five addresss. The first, Apology, represents another effort to support faith against the onslaughts of the advocates of the Enlightenment. On the Essence of Religion, on the other manus, claims that faith can non be the object of cognition. In the 3rd address, On Self-formation for Religion, Friedrich Daniel Ernst Schleiermacher affirms that faith is a portion of the material universe. On the Social Element in Religion ; or on Church and Priesthood he proposes a new, societal construct of the Church. And, in conclusion, in On the Religions, he stresses the human necessity of a higher go-between who communicates the messages of God. In the same twelvemonth, Friedrich Daniel Ernst Schleiermacher besides published several other plants: Briefe bei Gelegenheit der politisch- theologischen Aufgabe und diethylstilbestrols Sendschreibens ji?discher Hausvi?ter ( Letters on the Juncture of the Political-Theological Task and the Open Letter of Jewish Householders ) , in which he demanded civic rights for Jews. In an essay entitled, Versuch einer Theorie des geselligen Betragens ( Toward a Theory of Sociable Conduct ) , he focuses i?simplyi? on conversation. In 1798/99 he produces a really rough reappraisal of Immanuel Kanti?s Anthropologie in pragmatischer Hinsicht, which he dismisses as mere i?Kantologiei? and therefore irrelevant. In Monologen: eine Neujahrsgabe ( Soliloquies, 1800 ) , Friedrich Daniel Ernst Schleiermacher focuses once more on moralss sing human individualism as a symbol of the space. Another related work is Grundlinien einer Kritik der bisherigen Sittenlehre ( Outlines of a Critique of Previous Ethical Theory Morality to day of the month, 1803 ) . Once more a review of Immanuel Kant ( but besides of Johann Gottlieb Fichte ) , Friedrich Daniel Ernst Schleiermacher criticizes all old ethical theories and systems and, following Baruch Spinoza, affirms that a moral system can be obtained merely through an across-the-board rule: i?For when it is the good that is under consideration, and the ethical object is prevailing, truth must be considered more in mention to art than scientific discipline, if, that is, integrity is to be preserved in the work generallyi? , he writes in the i?Introductions to the Dialogues of Plato.i? In 1802, Friedrich Daniel Ernst Schleiermacher served as curate in Stolp ( Pomerania ) , but merely for one twelvemonth. He went back to Halle, where he, following to his responsibilities as sermonizer, was appointed professor of theology.There he finished his most popular work, Die Weihnachtsfeier: Ein Gespri?ch ( Christmas Eve: A Dialogue on the Celebration of Christmas, 1806 ) , in which he elaborates on the significance of this banquet. After Napoleoni?s invasion in 1807, Friedrich Daniel Ernst Schleiermacher returned to Berlin and was finally awarded the theological chair at the new Friedrich Wilhelm University in Berlin, a station that he held until his decease. Having become a member of the Academy of Sciences in 1811, Friedrich Daniel Ernst Schleiermacher spent the following old ages talking and prophesying. At that clip he was besides a strong advocator of a brotherhood between the two Protestant Churches. Besides in the same twelvemonth, Friedrich Daniel Ernst Schleiermacher published his Kurze Darstellung des theologischen Studiums ( Brief Outline of the Study of Theology ) , where he distinguishes between three theological subjects, viz. philosophical divinity, historical divinity, and practical divinity. Between 1821 and 1822, he finished his of import work Der christliche Glaube, nach den Grundsi?tzen der evangelischen Kirche im Zusammenhange dargestellt ( The Christian Faith ) , a instead Orthodox reading of Christian rules, with which he attempts to happen a new construct of faith and, therewith, reform Protestantism towards diverseness. Defining dogmatic divinity as i?the scientific discipline which systematizes the philosophy prevalent in a Christian Church at a given clip, i? Friedrich Daniel Ernst Schleiermacher conceives i?the kernel of religioni? chiefly as i?the feeling of an absolute dependencei? on God. Religion, seen as such, is therefore first and foremost an intuition, non a morality. Schleiermacheri?s most profound part to doctrine, as is frequently stated, was his talks on hermeneutics. The undertaking of hermeneutics, he argues, is to demo the purpose of the writer and therefore uncover the i?true meaningi? of a text. Harmonizing to Schleiermacher, there needs to be two signifiers of reading: a lingual reading and a psychological reading. Whereas the former trades with common characteristics of linguistic communication, the latter remainders upon the individualism of the writer. In add-on, he distinguishes between two methods for reading, a comparative one, tied to the lingual signifier, and a divinatory, related to the psychological signifier of reading. In the class of his chair in Berlin, he often lectured on dialectics, but failed in the effort to develop a distinguished theoretical attack to it. However, Friedrich Daniel Ernst Schleiermacher rejected Manichaean rules, such as the division between an rational kingdom and an organic 1. For him, everything is a consequence of both kingdoms, and this applies to the long-standing dichotomy between the organic structure and psyche every bit good. Frequently named the laminitis of modern Protestant divinity, Friedrich Daniel Ernst Schleiermacher attempted to intercede between the Enlightenment ( and, earlier Romanticism ) and Protestantism. Despite crisp unfavorable judgment from neo-orthodox theologists, his work had a great impact on theological discourse up until the early 20th century. Friedrich Daniel Ernst Schleiermacher died of pneumonia in 1834 ; his Si?mmtliche Werke ( Collected Works ) were published posthumously, between 1835 and 1856, in three parts: Zur Theologie ( Theology, 11 Volumes ) , Predigten ( Sermons, 10 Volumes ) , and Zur Philosophie ( Philosophy, 9 Volumes ) .